MaskRay wrote: > Shouldn't plain `-fsanitize=undefined` disable this sanitizer by default > (requiring explicit opt-in)? In `-fwrapv` mode this is not undefined > behavior, so `-fsanitize=undefined` should not complain about it.
I was on the fence whether `-fsanitize=undefined` should expand to signed-integer-overflow: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80089#issuecomment-1945202620 Perhaps you have run into some convenience issues? #85501 for the signed-integer-overflow suppresion. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
