================
@@ -520,5 +515,136 @@ void DylibVerifier::VerifierContext::emitDiag(
Report();
}
+// The existence of weak-defined RTTI can not always be inferred from the
+// header files because they can be generated as part of an implementation
+// file.
+// InstallAPI doesn't warn about weak-defined RTTI, because this doesn't affect
+// linking and so can be ignored in text files.
+static bool shouldIgnoreCpp(StringRef Name, bool IsWeakDef) {
+ return (IsWeakDef &&
+ (Name.starts_with("__ZTI") || Name.starts_with("__ZTS")));
+}
+void DylibVerifier::visitSymbolInDylib(const Record &R, SymbolContext &SymCtx)
{
+ if (R.isUndefined()) {
----------------
ributzka wrote:
Please add comments to the various checks and why they are considered valid or
ignored.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86025
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
