================ @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +//===- ExtractAPI/Serialization/APISetVisitor.h ----------------*- C++ -*-===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +/// +/// \file +/// This file defines the ExtractAPI APISetVisitor interface. +/// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_EXTRACTAPI_SERIALIZATION_SERIALIZERBASE_H +#define LLVM_CLANG_EXTRACTAPI_SERIALIZATION_SERIALIZERBASE_H + +#include "clang/ExtractAPI/API.h" + +namespace clang { +namespace extractapi { + +// A helper macro to implement short-circuiting when recursing. It +// invokes CALL_EXPR, which must be a method call, on the derived +// object (s.t. a user of RecursiveASTVisitor can override the method +// in CALL_EXPR). +#define TRY_TO(CALL_EXPR) \ + do { \ + if (!getDerived()->CALL_EXPR) \ + return false; \ + } while (false) + +/// The base interface of visitors for API information, the interface and usage +/// is almost identical to RecurisveASTVistor. This class performs three +/// distinct tasks: +/// 1. traverse the APISet (i.e. go to every record); +/// 2. at a given record, walk up the class hierarchy starting from the record's +/// dynamic type until APIRecord is reached. +/// 3. given a (record, class) combination where 'class' is some base class of +/// the dynamic type of 'node', call a user-overridable function to actually ---------------- QuietMisdreavus wrote:
Should this `'node'` here actually say `'record'`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86676 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits