================
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -Wunused -x c -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -Wunused -x c++
-verify=expected,cxx %s
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+static int f(void) { return 42; }
+int g(void) __attribute__((alias("f")));
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
This seems wrong to me, a false negative.
FWICT, for C++ mode, even in an `extern "C"` block, it seems that functions
with static linkage get mangled. Or... Oh, look, more behavioral differences
from GCC: https://godbolt.org/z/sa4e7aYqj
We mangle, they do not. That's going to lead to further compatibility issues
when trying to use this function attribute.
---
Ah! right you pointed this out in your note. Perhaps we should fix/change that
first in clang?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87130
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
