cor3ntin wrote: > Do you mean that you would reject a proposal that adds Clang-specific trait > (with another name) that implements P1144's semantics?
A proposal that explores trivial swapability for example, with the understanding it would be a subset of trivially relocatable types might be worth exploring as a separate feature. Hopefully this would go through careful design and RFC. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84621 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
