rupprecht wrote: This commit appears to regress an example like this:
```c++ template <typename T> struct Foo { template <typename X> int bar(X x) { return 0; } template <> int bar(int x) { return bar(5.0); } }; void call() { Foo<double> f; f.bar(1); } ``` Used to compile, now results in an error: ``` PR87541.cpp:10:12: error: call to non-static member function without an object argument 10 | return bar(5.0); | ^~~ PR87541.cpp:16:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'Foo<double>::bar<int>' requested here 16 | f.bar(1); | ^ ``` Is that intended? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87541 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits