AaronBallman wrote:
> > > Note that
> > > ```c++
> > > auto div(_Complex float lhs, _Complex float rhs) {
> > > return lhs / rhs;
> > > }
> > >
> > > int main() {
> > > return __real div(1.f, 2.f);
> > > }
> > > ```
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > will fail to link on windows due to `__divsc3` not being available.
> > > Similar programs probably also fail due to other compiler-rt functions
> > > not being available.
> >
> >
> > I _think_ Clang still gets to claim conformance here because we handle the
> > language side of things correctly and the user is responsible for linking
> > to a runtime library with appropriate support for the platform. However,
> > this sure does straddle the line in some ways, so I could see this being a
> > reason to claim "partial" conformance.
>
> IIRC the problem is that you can't get compiler-rt on windows. If it was just
> a matter of compiling compiler-rt with clang I'd be 100% with you. Partial
> conformance with a note that some operations require compiler-rt functions
> that aren't available on windows seems like a good compromise to me.
Yeah, that seems like a reasonable compromise. I'll make updates for that,
thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88161
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
