pogo59 wrote: > @pogo59 Hmm - I thought you held a strong preference that debugger tuning > never be the only way to access a certain feature, and that we should always > have direct control of these features via flags (but with default (or > explicit) debugger tuning setting some of these flag defaults based on the > preferred content for that debugger). Perhaps i'm misremembering?
You are not misremembering. Ideally _tuning_ is not _gating_ (although we probably never expressed it that way). We probably have not fully held to that ideal, but if we're going to have knobs to tweak we should implement the knobs properly. I will be making another pass over this PR later today and pay attention to that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87623 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
