MaskRay wrote: > > I think I've addressed all comments and changed the patch to rebase on the > > improved tests. > > @AaronBallman @tstellar Are you happy with the current version? > > Please file an issue for this: > > > I added microsoftDemangle tests to show the current behavior. > > Since the feature that demangles to the function name without parameters > > (f3 instead of f3(int)) appears to be missing, I cannot > address > > -Wunused-function false positives for microsoftDemangle with reasonable > > time complexity. > > and file a second one to come back and fix this issue once we can demangle > with parameters.
Created #88823 and #88825 Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87130 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
