martinboehme wrote:
Here's a draft that shows what `PropagateResultObject()` looks like when
refactored using a switch statement.
I'm not sure if this is an improvement or not. I do see how this makes the case
distinction clearer -- OTOH, we have one more level of indentation now (though
that doesn't really hurt formatting), and there's duplication between the
switch cases and the casts, for example:
```cxx
case Stmt::BinaryOperatorClass: {
auto *Op = cast<BinaryOperator>(E);
```
Would appreciate opinions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88865
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
