dougsonos wrote: > > I think the code to do this could live in the effect set if it were under > > Sema (as I just described) > > Seeing as the effect set is part of the type, at least the parts that are > stored in the `FunctionProtoType` can’t be in Sema and have to stay in the > AST library.
The idea is to have `FunctionProtoType` just vend `ArrayRef<FunctionEffect>` and `ArrayRef<FunctionEffectCondition>`, then have `FunctionEffectSet`, part of `Sema`, have a constructor that combines those from a `FunctionProtoType`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
