mgorny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764#606638, @beanz wrote:
> Looping in @eugenis, who added i686 support in r218761. > > eugenis, since i686 is identical to i386 generating it as a separate target > is undesirable. Can you help advise as to how we can better meet your needs > and not duplicate an effectively identical target? I suspect https://reviews.llvm.org/D26796 attempts to solve the same problem. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
