================
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s
+
+// GH87641 noticed that integer promotion of a bit-field of bit-precise integer
+// type was promoting to int rather than the type of the bit-field.
+struct S {
+ unsigned _BitInt(7) x : 2;
+ unsigned _BitInt(2) y : 2;
+ unsigned _BitInt(72) z : 28;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
Is there a reason all of these are unsigned? Maybe adding some tests for signed
`_BitInt`s as well might be a good idea—or do we have those already?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89254
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
