bwendling wrote:
> Strictly speaking, I don't think this is NFC. Consider, for example:
>
> ```
> struct S {
> struct X { int array[1]; } x;
> struct Y { int count; int array[] __attribute__((__counted_by__(count))); }
> y;
> };
> void f(void* __attribute__((pass_dynamic_object_size(0))));
> void g(struct S* s) { f(s->y.array); }
> ```
Hmm.. Yeah, this change makes it more accurate. I'll remove the tag.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
