================ @@ -318,12 +320,12 @@ // RUN: %clang -### -fassociative-math -freciprocal-math -fno-signed-zeros \ // RUN: -fno-trapping-math -ftrapping-math -c %s 2>&1 \ -// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO-UNSAFE-MATH %s +// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-UNSAFE-MATH %s // CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO-UNSAFE-MATH: "-cc1" -// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO_UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-funsafe-math-optimizations" -// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO_UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-mreassociate" -// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO_UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-funsafe-math-optimizations" +// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO-UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-funsafe-math-optimizations" +// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO-UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-mreassociate" +// CHECK-NO-REASSOC-NO-UNSAFE-MATH-NOT: "-funsafe-math-optimizations" ---------------- arsenm wrote:
I don't think this testing technique works. All of these flags would be printed on the same line as cc1. You would need to use CHECK-SAME-NOT, but I'm not sure you can actually compose -SAME and -NOT checks -NOT checks are hazardous this way, can we positively check for the flags that are emitted. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
