sam-mccall wrote:

Yes, it's approximately the same problem. Thanks & sorry for the noise!

(We have a non-clang include-scanner that computes dependencies to ensure 
hermetic builds. The indirect include defeats the include scanner, so we were 
accidentally relying on `<vector>` being available for some other reason - 
which I suppose was this one).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87442
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to