cor3ntin wrote:

> Ah, I see. I haven't tried that, but one downside I can see is that it will 
> make diagnostics for CTAD worse, we need to spell the type trait name in 
> error messages when the __is_deducible trait fails.

I think we should have a custom diag for that anyway
"is not deducible from" is better than " `__is_deducible<>` is false"


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to