dwblaikie wrote: > > C doesn't have an odr, does it? > > For non-C++ "ODR" has a meaning more like "ODR-inspired checks". But there is > no language rule that would require enforcement and there is no impact on > linkage (at least during deserialization).
Not sure I'm following the response here - but I guess what I'm trying to say, with more words, is that my understanding was that C doesn't have an ODR, and you can have different definitions of a type, with the same name, in C and that's OK. And it sounds like this change makes that not OK in some way? (either by diagnosing/erroring on such divergent types, or assuming they won't diverge and carrying on silently) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90298 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
