================
@@ -423,6 +450,52 @@ ExprResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnIntExpr(OpenACCDirectiveKind
DK,
return IntExpr;
}
+ExprResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnVar(Expr *VarExpr) {
+ // We still need to retain the array subscript/subarray exprs, so work on a
+ // copy.
+ Expr *CurVarExpr = VarExpr->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
+
+ // Sub-arrays/subscript-exprs are fine as long as the base is a
+ // VarExpr/MemberExpr. So strip all of those off.
+ while (isa<ArraySectionExpr, ArraySubscriptExpr>(CurVarExpr)) {
+ if (auto *SubScrpt = dyn_cast<ArraySubscriptExpr>(CurVarExpr))
+ CurVarExpr = SubScrpt->getBase()->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
+ else
+ CurVarExpr =
+ cast<ArraySectionExpr>(CurVarExpr)->getBase()->IgnoreParenImpCasts();
+ }
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
My reading of the standard says 'no', it shouldn't? I wouldn't consider that
to be an 'array-element'.
Both of the existing implementations I have access to also reject it:
https://godbolt.org/z/Pj98d6c5M
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90521
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
