erichkeane wrote: >This is the option I've decided to go with here. There's a slight wrinkle in >that we create a LookupResult that claims we looked up the unnamed field for >the anonymous class -- even though we would obviously never be able to look up >an unnamed field. I think this is defensible and still better than the other >alternatives, but I would welcome feedback on this from others who know the >code better.
I actually prefer option#2. This doesn't really do what it should, so I think we should just make sure we materialize the temporary if necessary in `RebuildMemberExpr`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90842 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
