dwblaikie wrote: > > Comment in the code should probably mention this as a FIXME and include a > > reference to the issue? > > Sure, added in > [f78949a](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f78949a07e33017a798c410a102c95455685a9b1)
Thanks! > > Also, there's another bug here - the DW_TAG_typedef is in the CU scope, > > instead of the struct scope. But if the struct is a non-template, the > > typedef is in the struct scope as it should be, not the CU scope... > > That does looks odd - I can reproduce it with normal (language-level) > typedefs too (rather than with template aliases): > https://godbolt.org/z/GsGKqhKzz. I can open a separate issue? Yep! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90032 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
