dougsonos wrote: Hi Chris,
Currently I had only envisioned that `nonblocking` would have the optional conditional expression parameter, so `blocking(false)` should generate an error. I had mistakenly thought that the parser would take care of this via the ways that the attributes are declared. Is there a compelling reason to support `blocking(false)` as a synonym for `nonblocking`? beyond symmetry? If not, I'll just fix the argument count check. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
