petrhosek wrote: > > This is an alternative approach to address the issue described in > > [discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-support-for-memory-regions-in-elf/78570](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-support-for-memory-regions-in-elf/78570) > > which doesn't require a custom section type. > > This RFC is about `SHT_LLVM_MEMORY` while this patch seems orthogonal?
We might still consider implementing `SHT_LLVM_MEMORY` since it'd enable new use cases, but this PR addresses one of the issues described in that RFC without requiring significant changes in either LLVM or the existing code. > I agree that the option is useful in some cases. If `ld -r` is used, > `--unique` will be needed to not destroy granularity. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91028 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
