smeenai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27387#612975, @EricWF wrote:
> I wonder if we should consider this a breaking ABI change and control it > using a `_LIBCPP_ABI` macro. @mclow.lists thoughts? This is forward-compatible (as in clients built against an older libc++ would be happy with this version) but not backwards-compatible (as in clients built against this version would not be able to run against an older libc++). Has libc++ been aiming to maintain compatibility in both directions? https://reviews.llvm.org/D27387 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
