efriedma-quic wrote: > It seems to me this is a case where we're trying to work -around an llvm bug? > Should we just be fixing that instead?
You mean, revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 ? Making any changes in LLVM here is painful; I'd rather not revisit that. CC @hvdijk @rnk https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
