================
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+// REQUIRES: amdgpu-registered-target
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spirv64-amd-amdhsa -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_fp64 : enable
+
+kernel void test () {
+
+  int sgpr = 0, vgpr = 0, imm = 0;
+
+  // sgpr constraints
+  __asm__ ("s_mov_b32 %0, %1" : "=s" (sgpr) : "s" (imm) : );
+
+  __asm__ ("s_mov_b32 %0, %1" : "={s1}" (sgpr) : "{exec}" (imm) : );
+  __asm__ ("s_mov_b32 %0, %1" : "={s1}" (sgpr) : "{exe" (imm) : ); // 
expected-error {{invalid input constraint '{exe' in asm}}
+  __asm__ ("s_mov_b32 %0, %1" : "={s1}" (sgpr) : "{exec" (imm) : ); // 
expected-error {{invalid input constraint '{exec' in asm}}
+  __asm__ ("s_mov_b32 %0, %1" : "={s1}" (sgpr) : "{exec}a" (imm) : ); // 
expected-error {{invalid input constraint '{exec}a' in asm}}
----------------
arsenm wrote:

If we really have to tolerate asm, I wonder if we can ban physical register 
references through SPIRV (other than for maybe the handful of named special 
register). That is, allow exec/m0/vcc and disallow any numbered registers. The 
exact register counts move around from target to target and are exposing bonus 
ABI 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to