cor3ntin wrote: The committee says so
Because launder is just adding a fence on a pointer to T, we need not know what T is. I don't know whether there are scenarios where calling launder on an incomplete type would be useful (as presumably you would new an object right before which would require completeness) but it's also harmless. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91070 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
