Sirraide wrote: > Maybe the easiest way would be to add a real attribute for clspv?
What exactly would the requirements for such an attribute be? Does it need to take a parameter or do you only need one way of tagging functions? Asking because I can go ahead add one as part of this pr if that’s the easiest solution so we can clean up this `assume` situation. That also means we wouldn’t need an `omp_assume` spelling for the `assume` attribute. On that note, what name would you recommend for such an attribute? Probably `cl_something` or `clspv_something`, but I’m not sure what that `something` would be. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84934 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
