================ @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ DYNAMIC_TAG(RELRSZ, 35) // Size of Relr relocation table. DYNAMIC_TAG(RELR, 36) // Address of relocation table (Relr entries). DYNAMIC_TAG(RELRENT, 37) // Size of a Relr relocation entry. +DYNAMIC_TAG(CREL, 38) // CREL relocation table + ---------------- smithp35 wrote:
While we are using a section type in the [LOOS, HIOS) range, is it worth using a dynamic tag in the [LOOS, HIOS) range. As an aside, would a tag containing the number of CRELs (NCREL for example). This in theory could be used to pre-allocate memory for an expanded CRELs. I don't think it is worth doing unless there is a clear need though. I could imagine most dynamic linkers iterating through the LEB directly. Although not strictly necessary a CREL Size (CRELSZ?) could be useful for a consumer to read all the CRELs into memory without having to read the header first to find the size. Again not worth doing unless we have a definite need for it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91280 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
