================
@@ -14638,6 +14649,8 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr 
*E) {
     return true;
   }
 
+  case Builtin::BIfmin:
+  case Builtin::BIfminf:
----------------
hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:

At the Clang C/C++ Language Workgroup call on 2024-05-15, it was agreed that 
`-fno-builtin[-*]` should remain capable of disabling built-in treatment even 
when that treatment would be required for conformance w.r.t. `constexpr` 
behaviour of functions shared with C.

For me, the first expectation for this PR (on that subject) is an update to the 
documentation of `-fno-builtin[-*]`.

@AaronBallman @ldionne, I am no sure how we want to handle this w.r.t. 
documenting the C++23 implementation status. Does it go in both the Clang 
documentation (for the functions shared with C) and the libc++ documentation 
(for the overloads added by C++)?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to