================
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
     br i1 %6, label %4, label %5, !llvm.loop !9
   }
 
-  attributes #0 = { nofree norecurse nosync nounwind uwtable writeonly 
mustprogress "frame-pointer"="none" "min-legal-vector-width"="0" 
"no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" 
"target-cpu"="x86-64" 
"target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+x87,-aes,-avx,-avx2,-avx512bf16,-avx512bitalg,-avx512bw,-avx512cd,-avx512dq,-avx512er,-avx512f,-avx512ifma,-avx512pf,-avx512vbmi,-avx512vbmi2,-avx512vl,-avx512vnni,-avx512vp2intersect,-avx512vpopcntdq,-avxvnni,-f16c,-fma,-fma4,-gfni,-kl,-pclmul,-sha,-sse,-sse2,-sse3,-sse4.1,-sse4.2,-sse4a,-ssse3,-vaes,-vpclmulqdq,-widekl,-xop"
 "tune-cpu"="generic" }
+  attributes #0 = { nofree norecurse nosync nounwind uwtable writeonly 
mustprogress "frame-pointer"="none" "min-legal-vector-width"="0" 
"no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" 
"target-cpu"="x86-64" 
"target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+x87,-aes,-avx,-avx2,-avx512bf16,-avx512bitalg,-avx512bw,-avx512cd,-avx512dq,-avx512f,-avx512ifma,-avx512pf,-avx512vbmi,-avx512vbmi2,-avx512vl,-avx512vnni,-avx512vp2intersect,-avx512vpopcntdq,-avxvnni,-f16c,-fma,-fma4,-gfni,-kl,-pclmul,-sha,-sse,-sse2,-sse3,-sse4.1,-sse4.2,-sse4a,-ssse3,-vaes,-vpclmulqdq,-widekl,-xop"
 "tune-cpu"="generic" }
----------------
phoebewang wrote:

I think maybe we can do an NFC patch to remove these "target-features"="..." 
given we have already had "target-cpu"="xxx".

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92883
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to