zyn0217 wrote: > It seems this change cause https://godbolt.org/z/311nb6xYe to fail. Could you > please take look?
> Also: > https://godbolt.org/z/bYs7Y9v11 I don't see any justification that these examples should compile: the first example is a typical one handled by #90152 (from the release note): ```rst - Clang now looks up members of the current instantiation in the template definition context if the current instantiation has no dependent base classes. template<typename T> struct A { int f() { return this->x; // error: no member named 'x' in 'A<T>' } }; ``` and the second one would also be rejected by GCC once the inner class `b` gets instantiated. This earlier diagnostic is probably also triggered by #90152, but I'm not sure. @sdkrystian, is this behavior intended and from your recent patches? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89019 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
