================
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ extern "C" void body(...) {}
// IR-EMPTY:
// IR-NEXT: [[FOR_INC]]:
// IR-NEXT: %[[TMP34:.+]] = load i32, ptr %[[DOTTILE_0_IV_I]], align 4
-// IR-NEXT: %[[INC:.+]] = add nsw i32 %[[TMP34]], 1
+// IR-NEXT: %[[INC:.+]] = add i32 %[[TMP34]], 1
----------------
Meinersbur wrote:
`nuw` would be an idea for a Clang extension in the footsteps of [vector
extensions](https://releases.llvm.org/18.1.1/tools/clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#vectors-and-extended-vectors)
or
[`_ExtInt`](http://blog.llvm.org/2020/04/the-new-clang-extint-feature-provides.html)
which also exposed a feature that LLVM always supported. E.g.
```
typedef unsigned nowrap_unsigned_t __attribute__((ext_no_wrap));
for (nowrap_unsigned_t i = 0; i < n; ++i)
```
or
```
int [[clang::]]
```
However, the language consequences are immense.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91459
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
