================
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ class RefCounted {
void method();
void someFunction();
int otherFunction();
+ unsigned recursiveTrivialFunction(int n) { return !n ? 1 :
recursiveTrivialFunction(n - 1); }
+ unsigned recursiveComplexFunction(int n) { return !n ? otherFunction() :
recursiveComplexFunction(n - 1); }
+ unsigned mutuallyRecursiveFunction1(int n) { return n < 0 ? 1 : (n % 2 ?
mutuallyRecursiveFunction2(n - 2) : mutuallyRecursiveFunction1(n - 1)); }
+ unsigned mutuallyRecursiveFunction2(int n) { return n < 0 ? 1 : (n % 3 ?
mutuallyRecursiveFunction2(n - 3) : mutuallyRecursiveFunction1(n - 2)); }
+ unsigned mutuallyRecursiveFunction3(int n) { return n < 0 ? 1 : (n % 5 ?
mutuallyRecursiveFunction3(n - 5) : mutuallyRecursiveFunction4(n - 3)); }
+ unsigned mutuallyRecursiveFunction4(int n) { return n < 0 ? 1 : (n % 7 ?
otherFunction() : mutuallyRecursiveFunction3(n - 3)); }
+ unsigned mutuallyRecursiveFunction5(unsigned n) { return n > 100 ? 2 : (n %
2 ? mutuallyRecursiveFunction5(n + 1) : mutuallyRecursiveFunction6(n + 2)); }
----------------
haoNoQ wrote:
I think it may be a good idea to add a direct test for @MitalAshok's example.
```c++
void foo() { bar(); something_non_trivial(); }
void bar() { foo(); }
void test() {
foo();
bar();
}
```
where none of the functions call themselves directly. I'm still not quite sure
whether we're correctly confirming that `bar()` is non-trivial here, when we
start the analysis from `foo()`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91876
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
