Endilll wrote:

Sounds like you have a plan after this PR, which is good. I was worried that 
you're just applying `const` where it doesn't cause issues _today_. Such 
approach to const-correctness has been failing us (it leads to `const_cast`s 
down the usage chain).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93493
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to