https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:

I think we're going to be printing incorrect code either way, but with this 
patch, we're more likely to be closer to the original intent of the code than 
without the patch. So even though this isn't perfect, it's forward progress and 
I think we're fine to land it as-is. However, if we can fix it correctly, that 
would be preferred.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93131
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to