mizvekov wrote: > That's the opposite of my view. Mutation needs to be justified. "What if we > need it later" can be used to justify anything, and if we do need it later > then we change the code then. Until that point, readers can see `const` and > know that things aren't being changed out from under them while reasoning > about what the code does.
I agree that works well for small code bases, but in LLVM some of these changes lead to so much churn, I start to question their benefit. Speaking from a been there, done that POV. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93493 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
