mizvekov wrote: > :( My goal now is to fix xtensor implementation/original tests, so this is > not a question of reduction. I need to understand where the compiler picked a > different specialization with relaxed argument matching.
So from the reduction you can see you have a problem where `svector` is matching a partial specialization of `xtype_for_shape`, which it shouldn't. I see that you have a very similar problem to your first one, which is not fixed in main yet, where one of the partial specializations is ifdef'd out in a similar manner, that also very suspiciously looks like it should have been using the feature test macro instead: https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xtensor/blob/d9c3782ed51027b2d00be3c26288b2f74e4dbe94/include/xtensor/xexpression_traits.hpp#L106 Does changing that to the feature test macro help? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
