================
@@ -1062,6 +1063,159 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(const Expr
*E, unsigned Type,
return Builder.CreateSelect(Cmp, Res, ConstantInt::get(ResType, 0,
IsSigned));
}
+namespace {
+
+class ObjectSizeVisitor
+ : public ConstStmtVisitor<ObjectSizeVisitor, const Expr *> {
+ bool SkipASE;
+
+public:
+ ObjectSizeVisitor(bool SkipASE = false) : SkipASE(SkipASE) {}
+
+ const Expr *Visit(const Expr *E) {
+ return ConstStmtVisitor<ObjectSizeVisitor, const Expr *>::Visit(E);
+ }
+
+ const Expr *VisitStmt(const Stmt *S) { return nullptr; }
+
+ const Expr *VisitDeclRefExpr(const DeclRefExpr *E) { return E; }
+ const Expr *VisitMemberExpr(const MemberExpr *E) { return E; }
+ const Expr *VisitArraySubscriptExpr(const ArraySubscriptExpr *E) {
+ return SkipASE ? Visit(E->getBase()) : E;
+ }
+
+ const Expr *VisitCastExpr(const CastExpr *E) {
+ return Visit(E->getSubExpr());
+ }
+ const Expr *VisitParenExpr(const ParenExpr *E) {
+ return Visit(E->getSubExpr());
+ }
+ const Expr *VisitUnaryAddrOf(const clang::UnaryOperator *E) {
+ return Visit(E->getSubExpr());
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
With the latest version of your patch, with the following code, both
__builtin_dynamic_object_size() calls fold to 319, which is pretty clearly
wrong. (gcc folds the first call to 312, and the second to -1.)
```
void report(long);
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
char *bar[40];
argc = 1;
report(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(&bar[argc], 1));
report(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(bar[argc], 1));
return 0;
}
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86858
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
