================
@@ -1576,7 +1576,10 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(
TrailingReturnTypeLoc, &DS),
std::move(Attributes), DeclEndLoc);
- Actions.ActOnLambdaClosureQualifiers(Intro, MutableLoc);
+ // We have called ActOnLambdaClosureQualifiers for parentheses-less cases
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
> Yes, we need to set whether the lambda has a mutable keyword as soon as the
> parameters, if present, are parsed, as that affect the meaning of subsequent
> id-expressions
> When there are no parens, there can be a noexcept clause for example, and
> parsing that does requires knowing whether the lambda is mutable, so that we
> can adjust the type of any reference-to-capture.
Thanks, that makes sense! We currently set `LSI->Mutable` in
`ActOnLambdaClosureQualifiers()` , and while I think it's possible to move it
out of the function, I'm not opposed to leaving it as-is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93206
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
