owenca wrote: > @owenca Re. draft status: I thought a draft would be a better way (less > presumptuous, more tentative suggestion) to present one particular solution, > while acknowledging the possibility of alternatives. If that's not really the > way a draft is used or if it's more of a problem (e.g. people simply > filtering out drafts for whatever reason?) then I can remove the draftness; I > just didn't want to presume this change is the way to go.
My understanding is that draft pull requests are not ready for review, so I have always ignored them. From https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/: > Also, if you have a [CODEOWNERS > file](https://github.blog/2017-07-06-introducing-code-owners/) in your > repository, a draft pull request will suppress notifications to those > reviewers until it is marked as ready for review. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89956 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
