[clang] [llvm] [NVPTX] Revamp NVVMIntrRange pass (PR #94422)

[Alex MacLean via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -139,24 +138,23 @@ define ptx_device i32 @test_ctaid_w() {
 
 define ptx_device i32 @test_nctaid_y() {
 ; CHECK: mov.u32 %r{{[0-9]+}}, %nctaid.y;
-; RANGE: call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.y(), !range 
![[GRID_SIZE_YZ:[0-9]+]]
+; RANGE: call range(i32 1, 65536) i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.y()
 ; CHECK: ret;
        %x = call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.y()
        ret i32 %x
 }
 
 define ptx_device i32 @test_nctaid_z() {
 ; CHECK: mov.u32 %r{{[0-9]+}}, %nctaid.z;
-; RANGE: call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.z(), !range ![[GRID_SIZE_YZ]]
+; RANGE: call range(i32 1, 65536) i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.z()
 ; CHECK: ret;
        %x = call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.z()
        ret i32 %x
 }
 
 define ptx_device i32 @test_nctaid_x() {
 ; CHECK: mov.u32 %r{{[0-9]+}}, %nctaid.x;
-; RANGE_30: call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x(), !range 
![[GRID_SIZE_X:[0-9]+]]
-; RANGE_20: call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x(), !range 
![[GRID_SIZE_YZ]]
+; RANGE: call range(i32 1, -2147483648) i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x()
----------------
AlexMaclean wrote:

I agree it looks weird but my understanding as well is that it is fine, is 
there anyone else you think we should check with?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94422
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits