arsenm wrote: > Is there really a good use case for this? Can you use regular stores to > addrspace(7) instead? @krzysz00
I see these regularly used via inline asm in various ML code. We need to expose these in some way to stop people from doing that > > Also, do you really need a separate builtin for every legal type, or is there > some way they can be type-overloaded? Yes, I imagined we would handle images similar to the elementwise intrinsics. However, I don't think that approach works for loads. If we have to have overloads for loads, we probably should mirror it for stores. I think it makes more sense to solve the issue for the load case before the stores. They're a bit more complicated because you have the sign vs. zero extended cases to consider, and the overload would be on the return type https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94576 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
