ThomasRaoux wrote:

> (If it's for MLIR support, I'd like to have a discussion there, since I don't 
> thisk these scalars belong in `FloatType` and that the long-term solution is 
> to allow arbitrary newtypes / tags on bits / ... up there)

I don't want to speak for the author but I'm interested in this support. I 
replied on your thread on discourse:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-should-the-ocp-microscaling-float-scalars-be-added-to-apfloat-and-floattype/77530/8

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94735
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to