AlexVlx wrote:

> And I still strongly urge renaming what this is, given it is _not_ the type 
> for an unqualified C `void *`, as one would normally expect given it's in 
> Clang. Perhaps DummyPtrTy?

DummyPtrTy seems mnemonic / on point, but it might trigger antibodies from the 
LLVM side:) Perhaps `NoAddrSpacePtrTy` or something to that extent? What makes 
this unqualified is it being just a `ptr` and not a `ptr addrspace(n)`. On the 
other hand, since today it's an unconditional alias for `ptr addrspace(0)`, 
perhaps `AS0PtrTy` or somesuch thing could also work?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94388
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to