================
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+//===--- PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck.cpp - 
clang-tidy--------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
+
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(CXXRecordDecl, isAbstract) { return Node.isAbstract(); }
+} // namespace
+
+PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck::
+    PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck(StringRef Name,
+                                              ClangTidyContext *Context)
+    : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
+      MatchInheritedVirtualFunctions(
+          Options.get("MatchInheritedVirtualFunctions", false)) {}
+
+void PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck::storeOptions(
+    ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+  Options.store(Opts, "MatchInheritedVirtualFunctions", true);
+}
+
+void PointerArithmeticOnPolymorphicObjectCheck::registerMatchers(
+    MatchFinder *Finder) {
+  const auto PolymorphicPointerExpr =
+      expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(
+               pointerType(pointee(hasCanonicalType(hasDeclaration(
+                   cxxRecordDecl(unless(isFinal()),
+                                 cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(isVirtual()))))))))))
+          .bind("pointer");
+
+  const auto PointerExprWithVirtualMethod =
+      expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(pointerType(
+               pointee(hasCanonicalType(hasDeclaration(cxxRecordDecl(
+                   unless(isFinal()),
+                   anyOf(hasMethod(isVirtualAsWritten()), isAbstract())))))))))
+          .bind("pointer");
----------------
Discookie wrote:

Indeed, vtable-wise it works out, but the size could still be different. In 
fact, as noted in [the previous CSA checker's 
PR](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82977#issuecomment-1968111034), 
the size very rarely stays the same for subclasses, so this is still a good 
heuristic for bug-prone cases.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91951
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to