ahatanak wrote: > I think my last comment/question is still open? How/why did the symbol name > end up dropping any llvm/clang component to avoid collisions with other names?
I dropped llvm/clang because I didn't think it would cause any collision in practice, but I don't think we have to try too hard to shorten the prefix. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
