efriedma-quic wrote: > > Can we restrict this to targets where libm actually modifies errno? > > Do you mean it is better to have a function list, which actually modifies > `errno` ? For example, we should restrict to `__exp10`, but but not a general > top call `__exp `?
I said targets, not functions. For example, MacOS never set errno for math functions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits