earnol wrote: > Indeed, Clang doesn't provide int128_t for 32 bit targets, AFAIK.
It looks like a little bit more complex. I checked with Standalone-i386 and AddressSanitizer-i386 targets. They do have int128_t for 32 bit targets as soon as clang itself built as 64-bit binary. > > Could you please test #96240 in your environment to verify it has no such > > problem? > That PR does seem to work fine, in such an environment, in a quick adhoc test > setup - thanks! Excellent. Waiting for sign-off in this case. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93612 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
