rnk added a comment. The big change here is that `clang -O0` now applies the noinline attribute everywhere. I can see why someone might expect things to work that way, but it seems surprising to me at first glance.
Before this change I can imagine someone distributing a static archive of bitcode which could be used to produce debug binaries and release binaries. There are some issues with that (lack of lifetime markers), but it should mostly work. Before this change, this command line would do inlining: `clang -S -emit-llvm foo.c -o - | opt -O2 -S` Now it won't, even though I didn't explicitly pass -O0. Are we happy with that? https://reviews.llvm.org/D28053 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
